Is the previous comment a suggestion that I stole 12:00:17 captioneer's idea by using the word hay and should have suggested that he / she use hay on it's own? If it is we are getting into the territory where any more than 4 captions and we have mentioned what is in the picture. Perhaps the first person to use straw should have had dibs and the five or six that followed should have given a nod or an alternative suggestion. Are we not getting a little silly here or perhaps it is me.
I'm the author of the caption timed at 12:00:17 and I'm not in the least bit bothered that someone later put just "Hay". I'm quite happy with mine the way it is. Even if it is still stuck on zero votes!
No it's just me who gets fed up reading the same gag written in a number of slightly different ways ...would rather have each photo with only 20 captions of different content than 50 with more repeats than the BBC, but HAY thats just me.
email us
Is ths not a time when a suggestion to 12:00:17 that hay on its own would be better?
5:46pm
Is the previous comment a suggestion that I stole 12:00:17 captioneer's idea by using the word hay and should have suggested that he / she use hay on it's own? If it is we are getting into the territory where any more than 4 captions and we have mentioned what is in the picture. Perhaps the first person to use straw should have had dibs and the five or six that followed should have given a nod or an alternative suggestion. Are we not getting a little silly here or perhaps it is me.
5:57pm
I'm the author of the caption timed at 12:00:17 and I'm not in the least bit bothered that someone later put just "Hay". I'm quite happy with mine the way it is. Even if it is still stuck on zero votes!
6:10pm
No it's just me who gets fed up reading the same gag written in a number of slightly different ways ...would rather have each photo with only 20 captions of different content than 50 with more repeats than the BBC, but HAY thats just me.
6:39pm
Looks like someone's got a bad hat he chewed.
7:56pm