many times we can have the same joke written in completely different ways, where as with these its exactly the same words but a different gag. 1 is about pointing someone out with a capton me theme the other is about copying whilst doing a blatant copy, the original has to be read first for this 1 to work and so may even benifit from the popularity of this caption as i said before i couldnt vote for this without also the original.
OK Chris, but have you not noticed that some 'joker' has changed their 20:09:03 caption (can't remember what it said originally, but whatever it was hadn't got any votes) to exactly the same caption as these? The first copy may have been amusing (though not in my opinion worthy of a vote as it's still blatant copying) but this third one is way beyond a joke. I just hope no-one reads it first and votes for it.
I am the author of the original caption and thought this one was funny so I voted for it. I also changed my 8.09.03 caption because I thought we were having fun so I took the joke a stage further and you are correct it was silly, which is what I intended, I apologise if I took it a step too far. I never expected to be criticised on here for being silly.
Obviously there was no way I could have known you were the author of the 3rd caption as well. I thought I was defending your honour! Oh well, I'll shut up now.
email us
have to vote for both captions as this needs to remain below the original but it did make me smile.
6:34am
I was tempted to copy this, then add a nod to 0:04:54, just to confuse things further.
7:44am
See 20.09.03
10:56am
This is getting silly now.
10:57am
That this caption has got nearly as many votes as the earlier one is ludicrous. Has everyone gone mad?
2:09pm
many times we can have the same joke written in completely different ways, where as with these its exactly the same words but a different gag. 1 is about pointing someone out with a capton me theme the other is about copying whilst doing a blatant copy, the original has to be read first for this 1 to work and so may even benifit from the popularity of this caption as i said before i couldnt vote for this without also the original.
3:13pm
OK Chris, but have you not noticed that some 'joker' has changed their 20:09:03 caption (can't remember what it said originally, but whatever it was hadn't got any votes) to exactly the same caption as these? The first copy may have been amusing (though not in my opinion worthy of a vote as it's still blatant copying) but this third one is way beyond a joke. I just hope no-one reads it first and votes for it.
5:34pm
I am the author of the original caption and thought this one was funny so I voted for it. I also changed my 8.09.03 caption because I thought we were having fun so I took the joke a stage further and you are correct it was silly, which is what I intended, I apologise if I took it a step too far. I never expected to be criticised on here for being silly.
7:21pm
Obviously there was no way I could have known you were the author of the 3rd caption as well. I thought I was defending your honour! Oh well, I'll shut up now.
7:03am