| All Time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quota | Added | Score | Rank | |
| Captions | 10 | 1288 | 2428 | #75 |
| Photos | ||||
| Comments | 3 | 30 | 19 | #88 |
| All Time | ||
|---|---|---|
| Voted | Rank | |
| Captions | 821 | #130 |
| Photos | 164 | #65 |
| Comments | 10 | #84 |
captionscomments receivedcaptioned photos
 |
| photos | scores | discuss | sign up / log in |
email us
Apart from balls of course!
2:54pm
comment on caption:
Nothing looks worse than a bush sticking out of a skimpy pair of knickers. [Steve Davies]
Even though it's got votes, I can't help think it would flow better if the answer was "Off the top of my head, I'd say about 5 minutes to 10"
7:53pm
comment on caption:
What time is it?
Oh about 5 mins to 10 of the top of my head. [Steve Davies]
What's the 7-up joke?
9:42pm
comment on caption:
Snows patience had finally run out,Dopey had told the 7up joke for the last time. [Steve Davies]
See 12.10.15
6:19pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]
This one is better. :)
6:30pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]
Better or not, it was someone else's idea. Ever heard of site etiquette?
6:48pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]
Site etiquette is an unwritten set of rules which is pretty difficult to follow because it's also up to interpretation. After someone has pointed out that there is a similar caption made earlier in the day and attention has been drawn to that fact, I feel that it's still fair enough to vote for the later if it is preferred. Also, I only have one vote. I would assume that other people are capable of reading the comments and making up their own minds as part of a democratic vote.
If nobody else agrees, then there won't be any more votes garnered.
7:16pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]
Is it not also etiquette that before you enter a caption, you look at what has already been entered to avoid duplicate entries? If it so happens that your idea has been used in a slightly different way, then you at least give a nod to the earlier caption, even if this was not what inspired you in the first place.
7:30pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]
True, but it is possible to miss that fact and once the initial caption has been referenced by another user that makes that point null and void. I reserve the right to vote for the captions I like best. Maybe others feel that way or maybe not, but unless anyone other than #anon is willing to comment I don't know. :)
8:08pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]
I have to agree with anon, the later caption is very similar to the earlier one. I haven't voted for either as I am not sure where the sixty second reference comes from. I think a nod to the first one is in order as is the custom in the last three years or so that I have been enjoying the sight. It only takes a minute to read the other captions and avoid duplicates, or should I say, 'sixty seconds'.
10:46pm
comment on caption:
On the face off it this religion could be around for years or gone in sixty seconds. [Steve Davies]