Caption author, just so you don't go without I was going to give you a lol and a clever vote.
For some reason I appear to have triggered the buffer pop up box for voting too fast and it continues to reinforce itself but only on this caption whilst I can freely vote on others. I have tried giving it antidepressants but that hasn't worked either.
I'll come back later and see if anything's changed but if not and you don't receive these votes this is what my intention was to be.
How ironic though that I seem to have broken this part of the system and now it is left to repeat itself! 😂
Glyn, the system is working as intended. For more information on the rate limit for first votes click here.
The stricter rate limits only affect captioneers with negative find quality. Only three captioneers have been affected by the limits in the last four months.
The more discerning you are as first voter on a caption, the less likely the limit will apply.
I know fine well that the system works and it's me at fault. If I really thought the system was playing up I'd contact your good self to see if it could be sorted out prontoish.
Yeah, the reason I was impressed by the caption is it's a bit like a bad workman blames his tools.
Is the individual themself at fault or do they blame their surroundings for their present condition or do they subsequently incorporate these surroundings into their present situation to make it more viable? If they do are they projecting on to those surroundings with what they're afflicted by? Or is it those that are in the surroundings that have the initial issue so the medicine that is administered accordingly is actually done so correctly? 😳
That's the brilliance of this caption.
I tried to follow suit with similar thematics in the comment but it appears that's probably failed miserably! Alas, I am stuck by voting myself in the foot! 🤗😂
I think I've broken the system 🤕
Caption author, just so you don't go without I was going to give you a lol and a clever vote.
For some reason I appear to have triggered the buffer pop up box for voting too fast and it continues to reinforce itself but only on this caption whilst I can freely vote on others. I have tried giving it antidepressants but that hasn't worked either.
I'll come back later and see if anything's changed but if not and you don't receive these votes this is what my intention was to be.
How ironic though that I seem to have broken this part of the system and now it is left to repeat itself! 😂
2:59pm
Glyn, the system is working as intended. For more information on the rate limit for first votes click here.
The stricter rate limits only affect captioneers with negative find quality. Only three captioneers have been affected by the limits in the last four months.
The more discerning you are as first voter on a caption, the less likely the limit will apply.
3:11pm
Sorry Chris, I was taking the piss.
I know fine well that the system works and it's me at fault. If I really thought the system was playing up I'd contact your good self to see if it could be sorted out prontoish.
Yeah, the reason I was impressed by the caption is it's a bit like a bad workman blames his tools.
Is the individual themself at fault or do they blame their surroundings for their present condition or do they subsequently incorporate these surroundings into their present situation to make it more viable? If they do are they projecting on to those surroundings with what they're afflicted by? Or is it those that are in the surroundings that have the initial issue so the medicine that is administered accordingly is actually done so correctly? 😳
That's the brilliance of this caption.
I tried to follow suit with similar thematics in the comment but it appears that's probably failed miserably! Alas, I am stuck by voting myself in the foot! 🤗😂
10:02pm