Thanks Anon, and Molly, and Al My message was similar to 8:02:37 (but independent from it), so the "problem" double up made me think maybe it was too close and required a nod ... but I do overthink things sometimes. Will erase the in-caption nod. Thanks all for the input.
email us
I think you're OK. I don't see the word 'problem' as proprietary. Different topic.
8:15am
It also has the word "a", but there's no need to nod to that either.
8:23am
You're cantankerous this morning, Molly! ;)
8:25am
Cantankerous? Observant, maybe - but I was just trying to reinforce the opinion that a nod to "problem" is unnecessary.
8:27am
Agreed. I think unless someone's piggybacking a unique theme, there's not an issue.
8:29am
Thanks Anon, and Molly, and Al
My message was similar to 8:02:37 (but independent from it), so the "problem" double up made me think maybe it was too close and required a nod ... but I do overthink things sometimes. Will erase the in-caption nod. Thanks all for the input.
8:30am
While "problem" and "a" could have been used with plagiaristic intent, I'm certain "8:02:37" has been used before.
8:41am
I don't see a problem, language should be used freely.
8:44am